Ban Night Flights Pyjama Protest

More than sixty national and international airport campaign groups supported ‘International Day for the Ban on Night Flights’ on Friday September 13th.

BAAN joined in by holding an eye-catching pyjama protest on Felton Common and the A38 Bristol Airport roundabout, which emphasised the need for peaceful nights and undisturbed sleep.

Many thanks to all who came and supported us

If you’d like to see the video explaining our action please click link here or on the images above and below.

Also there is a very good article in Bristol 24/7 explaining our action

And a great video by David Mathias here

https://www.bristol247.com/climate/news-climate/airport-exceeds-health-damaging-night-flight-quota-once-again-say-activists

video & image credit: David Mathias

Eyes On Website – Show & Test

We received a very encouraging response to our developing website at a ‘Show and Test’ session held at the Watershed’s Pervasive Media Studio.  During the session two of the the Eyes On team (Steve and Richard) had a chance to showcase the latest incarnation of the website that aims to monitor the flights to and from Bristol Airport in a bid to ensure the airport is abiding by the agreed planning conditions.  Not only did we receive positive comments but we also were able to gather useful insights on how the resource could be further improved.

Jackie Head from the Eyes On team said, ‘All along we had hoped that the Eyes On website would be a community resource, so it was imperative that people from the locality had an input into its design and workability. It has been a worthwhile journey that has helped transform the vision in our heads into a great website.  

In October we surveyed our cohort of email supporters and this has given us a real insight into the demographics and attitudes of the group.  We learnt so much from doing this exercise; for example ¾ of those who responded lived within 10 miles of the airport and approximately a third lived directly under the airport’s flight paths. It was also encouraging to learn that over 95% of the respondents were interested in using a website either once a month or week.  The greatest concern of an expanding airport was the impact of carbon and non-CO2 emissions, proving that these are not ‘not in my backyard’ (NIMBY) protesters, but people who recognise that local actions have global impacts.’

Following the survey the team ran two small focus groups who were shown an early example of the website for the first time developed by Jono Lewarne (www.cityeditionstudio.co.uk) and Jo Booth.  As a result of their valuable feedback we were able to identify 26 potential changes to the design and functionality of the resource.

Richard Baxter from Eyes One said, ‘The whole exercise in collaborating and consulting potential users of the Eyes On website has been a revelation. We were relieved to learn that it is a resource that the community would use and it is great to have received really useful feedback that has helped shape an engaging website. We hope its features will encourage people to come back time and again to check the latest news in holding Bristol Airport to account.’

Thanks to Danielle Rose, Network Producer, of Pervasive Media for her help in staging the Show and Test session as well as thanks to Jon Aitken for photography/videography.

‘Eyes On’ Protest At Bristol Airport

About 50 local residents and campaigners who have doggedly opposed Bristol Airport’s expansion over the past four years demonstrated at the A38 roundabout at the entrance of the airport on Wednesday 21st June 2023.  The key message to the Airport’s management and Canadian owners is ‘Bristol Airport: We are watching you!’.

Last month the UK Court of Appeal turned down the submission by Bristol Airport Action Network (BAAN) that further challenged the decision to expand Bristol Airport from 10 million passengers per year to 12 million.  It was in effect the end of the legal battle that has been raging over the past four years. Along with permission to expand, the public inquiry also agreed a range of conditions that the airport has to abide with. This peaceful and non-disruptive action demonstrated that the local community is determined to hold the airport to account especially on the promises and conditions that were agreed as part of the expansion decision.

The campaign groups and local authorities that opposed the expansion plans feel there is a real need to be vigilant especially as the airport has written confirmation of ambitions to further increase passenger numbers to 15 million per year in the 2030’s and to 20 million by the 2040’s.  The detrimental effects of current expansion plans on the local community and environment were well documented during the 10-week long Planning Inquiry in terms of more air and noise pollution, additional night flights, an increase in traffic congestion, illegal parking in the surrounding villages and loss of greenbelt land. Naturally, local residents are extremely concerned of the impact on their lives of an extra two million passengers using the airport so it is easy to imagine that the proposed doubling in size of the airport is going to make life totally intolerable.

There is also a lack of trust regarding the promises made by the airport which has been heightened by the case of Leeds Bradford Airport (LBA) that was found to breach planning rules last summer by operating 747 more night-time flights than allowed. It was the monitoring by local campaign groups that exposed this breach of 25% extra night flights by the airport.

Many people in the local community are exasperated and frustrated following the ruling by the UK Court of Appeal that turned down our submission that challenged the legality of the decision by the Planning Inquiry of 2021.  We still feel the decision is vastly short-sighted and ill-conceived on many levels.  The strength of opposition to the growth of the airport and the worries of increased greenhouse gas emissions were completely ignored by the Planning Inspectors and the courts.  Local democracy has been trashed and the impact on the environment was deemed to be inconsequential.  This is putting profit and greed before people and planet.

The courts know that the planning laws pertaining to aviation are out-dated and do not take into account the carbon and non-carbon emissions that airport expansion will produce. They also know this at a time when humanity is facing a climate emergency and should be doing everything possible to reduce our emissions. The effects of the climate emergency can be seen on a regular basis with reports of devastating floods, record ice melts, destructive wildfires, crop failures and loss of the web of life that humanity depends on.  It is also immoral that the Canadian owners, Ontario Teachers Pension Plan, (OTPP) are forcing this expansion on our local area when they are seeing a record number of ferocious forest wildfires cover the eastern coast of North America with thick smog resulting in life threatening and illegal air quality.